Democrats are the kings of twisting words. Somehow they also get to define the official narrative of controversial things as well. One example is the preposterous (in our view) terminology of “gender affirming care” for children.
Many would argue that doing that to children is the opposite of care or confirmation, especially since minors can’t do a lot of other things legally. Today, U.S. House Speaker Kevin McCarthy tweeted:
“JUST NOW → @HouseGOP passed the Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act. It’s a great day in America for fairness, families, and female athletes.”
U.S. House Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA) shockingly and dishonestly replied:
“What a creep. Kevin McCarthy wants to invade school locker rooms and inspect the genitals of our kids. Hell no.”
While we are an admittedly right leaning opinion news website, we try to report factual details and it seems like fact, not opinion, that Swalwell is poorly distorting the truth here.
Many on Twitter proverbially hit back at his tweet. Some referred to past allegations of an improper relationship Swalwell may have had with a “Chinese spy”.
The debate of what opinions are “allowed” and not “allowed” on social media rages on as it pertains to topics such as transgenderism.
Twitter has recently removed a rule against “deadnaming”, but it’s unclear if Facebook will do anything differently in that regard, despite Mark Zuckerberg copying Elon Musk in other areas, such as selling blue checks. Will Swalwell’s false tweet go unchecked?
a dna swab will do, fool
You comment is rather vague so not sure whom you’re replying to or what you mean.
Swalwell, aoc, mad maxine etc are more proof that intelligence is not a prerequisite to be elected as a dem leftist. A megalomaniac narcissistic profile with cash donors gets you in.