Lauren Boebert Throws Down Gauntlet, Describes Perfectly Why Nancy Pelosi is So Utterly Out of Touch: ’Forgotten What it Means to Actually Live a Normal American Life’

U.S. Congresswoman Lauren Boebert (R-CO) yesterday perfectly described why House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) is so utterly out of touch in a tweet.

Boebert explained, “Nancy Pelosi and the rest of the Democrat leaders have been in Washington for so long, they’ve entirely forgotten what it means to actually live a normal American life.”

“You can’t serve people who you no longer understand,” Boebert insisted.

As we reported yesterday, U.S. Congresswoman Abigal Spanberger (D-VA) lashed out at Pelosi, suggesting that perhaps new leadership is needed in the party.

Spanberg issued what Bloomberg’s Erik Wasson categorized as a “Scathing statement” after the House failed to bring up a stock-trading ban bill for a vote.

“This moment marks a failure of House leadership — and it’s yet another example of why I believe that the Democratic Party needs new leaders in the halls of Capitol Hill,” Spanberger said.

Pelosi bristled at the criticism by Spanberger, calling the press release “interesting” as she attempted to brush it off.

When asked by a reporter, Pelosi responded, “I’m strictly focused on winning the next election. Do you want to talk about that? Okay. Is that your question? Who’s next? And let me just say about Spanberger’s letter.”

“First of all, her bill is contained in this bill. Other members had ideas too, to improve upon the bill. So I didn’t see that. I mean, I don’t know what her statement is, but it is contrary to what the House Administration Committee — I said to them, whatever you, whatever the members want to do, I fully support. And they took her bill, added other others that made the bill stronger as a matter of fact. So this is an interesting press release, but it’s more important to write a bill.”

Pelosi then insisted that you have to have the votes to bring it up, to which the reporter asked if she did.

“Well, we’ll see. We’ll work at it. We don’t go from one day to the next. But I think we should have legislation. There are others who have spoken out against the bill. And again, this is the legislative process. But it is, what you, how you described her. Her characterization is not accurate. Her bill is in the bill. Others had ideas, too. And that’s what the committee put forth. But it’s good press because you asked the question.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *