During his allotted time to speak at today’s impeachment hearing. Congressman Dr. Wenstrup (R-OH) spent his time speaking about the Democrat’s attempt at removing President Trump from office. “I have seen hatred for political reasons, specifically on June 14, 2017, at a Baseball field in Virginia. I have seen hatred in war. I know that hatred blinds people. I have been in war, and I have studied war, and coups create division. It is time for this phase of the publicly announced and proclaimed Democratic coup to end,” Wenstrup said. The Democrat’s witness, Fiona Hill, appeared to agree with his premise.
WATCH VIDEO BELOW:
During yesterday’s hearing, Wenstrup questioned Ambassador Sondland’s claims of a quid pro quo. “Ambassador Sondland, you have used the words presumed, presumption, presuming, some form of the word to presume repeatedly today … You know a mathematical fact, 2 plus 2 does equal 4, but in reality, 2 presumptions plus 2 presumptions does not even equal one 1 fact,” Wenstrup stated. View the rest of the encounter below:
Ambassador Sondland has repeatedly said his claims are based on nothing more than presumptions.— Trump War Room (Text TRUMP to 88022) (@TrumpWarRoom) November 20, 2019
But two presumptions plus two presumptions does not equal even one fact!
“And the fact is, the President did tell you… no quid pro quo. That’s a fact." – @RepBradWenstrup pic.twitter.com/mO6J8UovSx
To help keep track of the witnesses, Benny Johnson tweeted out an Impeachment “Witness Round up:
Impeachment “Witness” Roundup:— Benny (@bennyjohnson) November 21, 2019
Taylor: witnessed nothing
Yovanovitch: witnessed nothing
Kent: witnessed nothing
Hill: witnessed nothing
Sondland: witnessed nothing
Volker: No quid pro quo
Morrison: No quid pro quo
Former Senator Claire McCaskill (D-MO), who lost her re-election bid 2018 stated on MSNBC “who cares who the tipster was?” GOP National Spokesperson Elizabeth Harrington tweeted out that soundbite:
Democrats say "who cares" who the registered Democrat with known bias against the President who colluded with Adam Schiff to trigger an impeachment based on false rumors?— Elizabeth Harrington (@LizRNC) November 21, 2019
"Who cares," they say.
They're only trying to overthrow a duly elected POTUS pic.twitter.com/TzpxXEBRee
Day five of the public Trump impeachment hearings wrapped up with Democrat House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff putting on a dramatic performance to try and nail down his case for impeaching President Trump. He claims that Trump and the Republicans are just mad that they ‘got caught’ in regards to the phone call with President Zelinsky of Ukraine that spurred this whole thing.
Rep. Jim Jordan and other House members on the House Intelligence Committee for the Republicans continue to assert, however, that there is no proof of any quid pro quo being offered or accepted between the Ukranian President and President Trump, therefore there is no offense.
- Virginia Senator Tim Kaine Endorses Biden for President - February 28, 2020
- Democratic Civil War Brewing: Bernie Sanders Supporters Express Support for a Primary Challenge to Elizabeth Warren in Massachusetts Senate Race - February 27, 2020
- Trump Flourishes on the World Stage in India - February 24, 2020